Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donny B. Lord (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete per consensus and per CSD G4. Not identical but close enough. No need for the salt shaker yet but I'll keep an eye on it. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Donny B. Lord (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unable to find any significant coverage of subject in reliable sources since previous AfD concluded "delete". Bongomatic 02:50, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and Salt This is purely a self-promotional piece of puffery. MarnetteD | Talk 03:13, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:19, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for all the reasons given above, and the reasons given in the previous AfD. Yes, salt please. Drmies (talk) 16:54, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete – recreation of previously deleted (AfD) material. ttonyb (talk) 17:48, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete. Although there is a significant acting role and at least one notable award, subject does not yet appear to meet the thresholds of WP:MUSIC or WP:GNG. Specifically, this person has not yet received significant coverage by independent sources that meet WP:RS. — Satori Son 20:30, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.