Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Winer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Reaper Eternal (talk) 17:51, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- James Winer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is about a chiropractor/nutritionist that has no sigfnificant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. The article was created by user:Doctor Winer which would suggest a conflict of interest. Edits from user:Jksoroka with comments such as "I have removed the biased opinion of the previous author, and substitute this authorized, factual bio from Dr. James Winer." would indicate that the COI is ongoing. Although COI is not a reason for deletion, when combined with lack of coverage in reliable sources, it makes for a stronger reason to delete. Whpq (talk) 15:17, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:54, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:58, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:ACADEMIC, WP:ANYBIO. Pburka (talk) 21:20, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:BIO and WP:NOTRESUME. Yoninah (talk) 07:27, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Could find no evidence of notability at Google, Google News, or Google Scholar. --MelanieN (talk) 20:06, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.