fixpart.hu Fixpart.hu

   
Az összes készülék javításának platformja – FixPart

Domain Summary

What percent of global Internet users visit Fixpart.hu?

9.7E-5% of global Internet users visit Fixpart.hu

How many people visit Fixpart.hu each day?

• Fixpart.hu receives approximately 4.8K visitors and 17,372 page impressions per day.

Which countries does Fixpart.hu receive most of its visitors from?

• Fixpart.hu is mostly visited by people located in Hungary,United States,Germany.

How much Fixpart.hu can earn?

• Fixpart.hu should earn about $6.99/day from advertising revenue.

What is Fixpart.hu estimated value?

• Estimated value of Fixpart.hu is $6,807.65.

What IP addresses does Fixpart.hu resolve to?

• Fixpart.hu resolves to the IP addresses 85.10.138.99.

Where are Fixpart.hu servers located in?

• Fixpart.hu has servers located in The Netherlands.

fixpart.hu Profile

Title:Az összes készülék javításának platformja – FixPart
Description:Az összes készüléke alkatrészeinek, karbantartási termékeinek és tartozékainak specialistája. Rendeld meg most az alábbi készülékekhez: mosogatógép, porszívó, hűtőszekrény, fagyasztó, mosógép, mikrohullámú sütő, sütő. Márka: Philips, Bosch, DeLonghi, Siemens, LG, Krups, Indesit
Category:eCommerce and Shopping / Price Comparison

What technologies does fixpart.hu use?

These are the technologies used at fixpart.hu. fixpart.hu has a total of 6 technologies installed in 5 different categories.

fixpart.hu Traffic Analysis

This website is viewed by an estimated 4.8K visitors daily, generating a total of 17.4K pageviews. This equates to about 145K monthly visitors. Fixpart.hu traffic has decreased by 12.68% compared to last month.
Daily Visitors4.8K
19.86%
Monthly Visits145K
12.68%
Pages per Visit3.63
21.94%
Visit duration03:16
30.09%
Bounce Rate50.75%
24.35%
Is this your site?Verify your site's metrics.
Daily Unique Visitors:
4,784
Monthly Visits:
144,955
Pages per Visit:
3.63
Daily Pageviews:
17,372
Avg. visit duration:
03:16
Bounce rate:
50.75%
Global Reach:
9.7E-5%
Monthly Visits (SEMrush):
197,302
Monthly Unique Visitors (SEMrush):
145,692
Monthly Visits (SimilarWeb):
146,462
HypeRank:
n/a
SEMrush Rank:
13,775,148
SimilarWeb Rank:
234,728
*All traffic values are estimates only.

Traffic sources

Direct:
38.90%
Referral:
1.00%
Search:
54.46%
Social:
0.23%
Paid:
5.41%

Desktop vs Mobile

Desktop:
24.88%
Mobile:
75.12%

Total Visits Last 3 Months

118.1K
DEC
166K
JAN
145K
FEB

Visitors by country

Country
Users%
 
Hungary 93.73%
 
United States 2.12%
 
Germany 1.87%
 
Netherlands 0.94%
 
Austria 0.68%

Which sites are competitors to fixpart.hu?

Websites similar to fixpart.hu are sites similar on user interests and browsing behavior. Users can discover new websites that are similar to the ones they already enjoy or find useful.
Domain
CompareDaily Visitors
arukereso.hu
Compare >461.3K
argep.hu
Compare >70.4K
washerhouse.com
Compare >15.5K
badu.hu
Compare >4.7K
Last update was 1 day ago
     
This can take up to 60 seconds. Please wait...

*HypeStat.com is not promoting or affiliated with fixpart.hu in any way. Only publicly available statistics data are displayed.

Search Engine Indexes

Search engine indexes are huge databases or collections of net pages that search engines like google like google and yahoo use to retrieve applicable facts while customers carry out searches. These indexes are created through search engines like google and yahoo through crawling and indexing net pages from throughout the internet.
Google Index:
1,130,000

 

SEMrush is a complete on line advertising and marketing platform that gives a extensive variety of gear and functions to help companies and entrepreneurs in enhancing their on line visibility and optimizing their virtual advertising and marketing strategies.
SemRushSemRush
Domain:
  fixpart.hu
Rank:
(Rank based on keywords, cost and organic traffic)
  13,775,148
Organic Keywords:
(Number of keywords in top 20 Google SERP)
  30
Organic Traffic:
(Number of visitors coming from top 20 search results)
  0
Organic Cost:
((How much need to spend if get same number of visitors from Google Adwords)
  $0.00

Revenue report

Google.com would generate approximately $7 per day if the source of income were advertisements, which equates to an estimated monthly revenue of $209.7 and annual gross revenue of approximately $2.6K. Based on these figures, the site's net worth is estimated at around $6.8K.

How much would fixpart.hu make?

Daily Revenue:
$6.99
Monthly Revenue:
$209.70
Yearly Revenue:
$2,551.35
*All earnings values are estimates only.

Daily earning by country

 
CountryPageviewsEarning
 
Hungary 16,283$3.75
 
United States 369$1.78
 
Germany 325$0.45
 
Netherlands 164$0.31
 
Austria 118$0.24

Loss of money due to Adblock?

Daily Revenue Loss:
$1.54
Monthly Revenue Loss:
$46.26
Yearly Revenue Loss:
$562.81
Daily Pageviews Blocked:
4,453
Monthly Pageviews Blocked:
133,587
Yearly Pageviews Blocked:
1,625,310

Daily revenue loss by country

 
CountryBlockedLost Money
 
Hungary 4,234$0.97
 
United States 66$0.32
 
Germany 94$0.13
 
Austria 31$0.06
 
Netherlands 28$0.05

How much is fixpart.hu worth?

Website Value:
$6.8K

Ad Experience Report

Summary of the ad experience rating of a website for a specific platform.

Mobile summary

Root domain:
fixpart.hu
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Desktop summary

Root domain:
fixpart.hu
Ad filtering:
(Chrome is not filtering ads on your site.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site that is reviewed for the Better Ads Standards.)
Not reviewed

Abusive Experience Report

Summary of the abusive experience rating of a website.
Root domain:
fixpart.hu
Enforcement:
(Chrome is not preventing your site from opening new windows or tabs.)
Off
Status:
(The status of the site reviewed for the abusive experiences.)
Not reviewed

Where is fixpart.hu hosted?

Fixpart.hu may be hosted in multiple data centers distributed in different locations around the world. This is probably just one of them.
Server IP:
85.10.138.99
ASN:
AS20857 
ISP:
Transip B.V. 
Server Location:

The Netherlands, NL
 

Other sites hosted on 85.10.138.99

How fast does fixpart.hu load?

The average loading time of fixpart.hu is 745 ms. The Desktop speed index is 100 and mobile speed index is 100.
Average Load Time:
745 ms

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Desktop

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 99% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)462ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 91% 5% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 5% 2% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 2%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)925ms 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 92% 5% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)89ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.0s 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 95% 3% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)1ms 94% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 94% 4% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 4% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)654ms 82% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 82% 13% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 13% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)940ms 93% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 93% 4% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interaction To Next Paint (INP)66ms 97% of loads for this page have a fast (<200ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 97% 1% of loads for this page have an average (200ms ~ 500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 1% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>500ms) Interaction To Next Paint (INP) 0%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.0s 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500ms ~ 4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000ms) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Time to Interactive 0.2 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
First Contentful Paint 0.2 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
Largest Contentful Paint 0.2 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Speed Index 0.4 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining

Page Speed (Google PageSpeed Insights) - Mobile

100
0-49 50-89 90-100 i

Field Data

Over the last 30 days, the field data shows that this page has a AVERAGE speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report.We are showing the 90th percentile of FCP and the 95th percentile of FID.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)5ms 99% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 86% 13% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 13% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)554ms 91% of loads for this page have a fast (<800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 90% 7% of loads for this page have an average (800s ~ 1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 7% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>1800s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 1%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.0s 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 94% 4% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 4% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average (0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)205ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<200s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 73% 24% of loads for this page have an average (200s ~ 500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 24% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>500s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<2500s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 94% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2500s ~ 4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 3% of loads for this page have a slow (>4000s) Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 3%

Origin Data

All pages served from this origin have an FAST speed compared to other pages in the Chrome User Experience Report. over the last 30 days.To view suggestions tailored to each page, analyze individual page URLs.

Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0ms 96% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.01s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 96% 2% of loads for this page have an average (0.01s ~ 0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 2% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.025s) Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS) 0%
Time To First Byte (TTFB)745ms 78% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 78% 17% of loads for this page have an average (0.8s ~ 1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 17% 4% of loads for this page have a slow (>1.8s) Time To First Byte (TTFB) 4%
First Contentful Paint (FCP)1.1s 92% of loads for this page have a fast (<1.8s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 92% 5% of loads for this page have an average (1.8s ~ 3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 5% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>3s) First Contentful Paint (FCP) 1%
First Input Delay (FID)0 0% of loads for this page have a fast (<0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have an average 0ms ~ 0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0% 0% of loads for this page have a slow (>0ms) First Input Delay (FID) 0%
Interactive To Next Paint (INP)162ms 83% of loads for this page have a fast (<0.2s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 83% 14% of loads for this page have an average (0.2s ~ 0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 14% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>0.5s) Interactive To Next Paint (INP) 1%
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)1.2s 95% of loads for this page have a fast (<2.5s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 95% 2% of loads for this page have an average (2.5s ~ 4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 2% 1% of loads for this page have a slow (>4s)Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) 1%

Lab Data

Largest Contentful Paint 0.8 s
Largest Contentful Paint marks the time at which the largest text or image is painted. Learn more about the Largest Contentful Paint metric
Largest Contentful Paint image was not lazily loaded  
Above-the-fold images that are lazily loaded render later in the page lifecycle, which can delay the largest contentful paint. Learn more about optimal lazy loading
INP by phase  
Start investigating with the longest phase. To reduce processing duration, , often JS. Delays can be minimized optimize the main-thread costs
CSS Selector costs  
If Recalculate Style costs remain high, selector optimization can reduce them. with both high elapsed time and high slow-path %. Simpler selectors, fewer selectors, a smaller DOM, and a shallower DOM will all reduce matching costs. Optimize the selectors
First Meaningful Paint  
First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible. Learn more about the First Meaningful Paint metric
Font display  
Consider setting to swap or optional to ensure text is consistently visible. swap can be further optimized to mitigate layout shifts with . font-display font metric overrides
Time to Interactive 0.8 s
Time to Interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive. Learn more about the Time to Interactive metric
Minimize third-party usage  
Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading. Learn how to minimize third-party impact
Render blocking requests  
Requests are blocking the page's initial render, which may delay LCP. can move these network requests out of the critical path. Deferring or inlining
Does not have a `<meta name="viewport">` tag with `width` or `initial-scale`  
A `<meta name="viewport">` not only optimizes your app for mobile screen sizes, but also prevents . a 300 millisecond delay to user input Learn more about using the viewport meta tag
Long critical network tree  
by reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load. Avoid chaining critical requests
Total Blocking Time 0 ms
Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds. Learn more about the Total Blocking Time metric
Lazy load third-party resources with facades  
Some third-party embeds can be lazy loaded. Consider replacing them with a facade until they are required. Learn how to defer third-parties with a facade
Third parties  
Third party code can significantly impact load performance. to prioritize your page's content. Reduce and defer loading of third party code
Preload Largest Contentful Paint image  
If the LCP element is dynamically added to the page, you should preload the image in order to improve LCP. Learn more about preloading LCP elements
Speed Index 1.3 s
Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated. Learn more about the Speed Index metric
First Contentful Paint 0.8 s
First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted. Learn more about the First Contentful Paint metric
LCP request discovery  
Optimize LCP by making the LCP image from the HTML immediately, and discoverable avoiding lazy-loading
Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms
The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration of the longest task. Learn more about the Maximum Potential First Input Delay metric
Forced reflow  
Many APIs, typically reading layout geometry, force the rendering engine to pause script execution in order to calculate the style and layout. Learn more about and its mitigations. forced reflow
Improve image delivery  
Reducing the download time of images can improve the perceived load time of the page and LCP. Learn more about optimizing image size

Does fixpart.hu use compression?

Website compression is the process of reducing the size of website files, such as HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and image files, to improve website performance and load times. Compressing website files can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be transferred from the server to the user's browser, resulting in faster page load times and improved user experience. Files on fixpart.hu are reduced by 83%.
fixpart.hu use gzip compression.
Original size: 191.94 KB
Compressed size: 31.19 KB
File reduced by: 160.75 KB (83%)

Google Safe Browsing

Google Safe Browsing is a service provided by Google that helps protect users from visiting websites that may contain malicious or harmful content, such as malware, phishing attempts, or deceptive software.
This site is not currently listed as suspicious

MyWot.com Reputation Ratings

MyWOT (short for "My Web of Trust") is a web-based reputation and rating service that provides users with information about the trustworthiness and safety of websites.
Status:
  SAFE

SSL Checker - SSL Certificate Verify

An SSL (Secure Sockets Layer) certificate is a digital certificate that establishes a secure encrypted connection between a web server and a user's web browser. It provides authentication and encryption, ensuring that data transmitted between the server and the browser remains private and protected. fixpart.hu supports HTTPS.
 fixpart.hu supports HTTPS
     
Verifying SSL Support. Please wait...
Common Name: fixpart.hu
Organization:
Location:
Issuer: R11
Valid from: Mar 19 02:33:34 2025 GMT
Valid until: Jun 17 02:33:33 2025 GMT
Authority: CA:FALSE
Keysize: 2048 Bits
Common Name: R11
Organization: Let's Encrypt
Location: US
Issuer: ISRG Root X1
Valid from: Mar 13 00:00:00 2024 GMT
Valid until: Mar 12 23:59:59 2027 GMT
Authority: CA:TRUE
Keysize: 2048 Bits

Verify HTTP/2 Support

HTTP/2 (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) is a major revision of the HTTP protocol, which is the foundation of data communication on the World Wide Web. It was developed as an improvement over the previous HTTP/1.1 version to enhance web performance and efficiency.
 fixpart.hu supports HTTP/2
     
Verifying HTTP/2.0 Support. Please wait...

Http Header

HTTP headers are extra portions of records despatched among a consumer (which include an internet browser) and a server at some stage in an HTTP request or response. They offer instructions, metadata, or manipulate parameters for the conversation among the consumer and server.
server: nginx
content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
vary: Accept-Encoding
cache-control: no-cache, private
date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 10:09:09 GMT
set-cookie: fp-sess=KB2U8hpbMVdkhDCgOqa9dRLt1eBnW53NDExPB5aJ; expires=Tue, 01 Apr 2025 10:09:09 GMT; Max-Age=345600; path=/; secure; httponly; samesite=lax
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
content-encoding: gzip
strict-transport-security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload;

Whois Lookup

Domain WHOIS is a public database that provides information about domain names, including registered owners, contact information, domain registrars, registration and expiration dates, name servers, and other relevant information. Domain registration for this website began on March 1, 2022 and will expire on March 30, 2025 if not renewed. This website is now assigned through the registrar . The WHOIS data for this website's domain was last updated on March 30, 2025.
Domain Created:
2022-03-01
Domain Age:
3 years 29 days
WhoIs:
 

% Whois server 4.0 serving the hu ccTLD


domain:         fixpart.hu
record created: 2022-03-01
Tovabbi adatokert ld.:
https://www.domain.hu/domain-kereses/
For further data see:
https://www.domain.hu/domain-search/